[gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 51: RasterIO() improvements : resampling and progress callback

[Frank Warmerdam]

+1 Frank


On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I think that the points raised in the discussion have been answered.
>
> Since the call for discussion, I've made a change in the RFC and proposed
> implementation so that the GDALRasterIOExtraArg* psExtraArg argument of
> RasterIO() remains optional for out-of-tree C++ code, but compulsory for
> in-
> tree code :
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc51_rasterio_resampling_progress?action=diff&version=4&old_version=3
>
> https://github.com/rouault/gdal2/commit/31a814acd091c93bd498b4b8c219b83bb40bb3ae
>
> So:
>
> Motion : I move to adopt RFC 51: RasterIO() improvements : resampling and
> progress callback
>
> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc51_rasterio_resampling_progress
>
> Starting with my +1
>
> Best regards,
>
> Even
>
> --
> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
> http://www.spatialys.com
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>



-- 
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam,
warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Software Developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20141201/f09328af/attachment.html>