[gdal-dev] GDAL 1.11 release plan

[Tamas Szekeres]

Hi,

Adding VS2012/VS2013 support in GISInternals is a separate action (not
included in the release plan).

In fact I'm not keen to add further build instances to the current build
server installation which has a pretty limited set of resources.
However I've got a promise to have a new VM on a blade, which will be
sufficient to set up the new environment including further build instances.

Best regards,

Tamas





2014-03-26 6:25 GMT+01:00 xavier lhomme <lhomme.xavier at gmail.com>:

> Hi
>   Adding Visual Studio 2012 2013 in GISInternals for Gdal 1.11 should be
> great too.
> Xav
> Le 25 mars 2014 22:57, "Tamas Szekeres" <szekerest at gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> That sounds good to me.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Tamas
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-03-25 22:37 GMT+01:00 Even Rouault <even.rouault at mines-paris.org>:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> GDAL 1.10 was released about one year ago, so it is time to think about
>>> the next
>>> release. I think we should just call it 1.11 given that there are no
>>> major
>>> architectural changes (although there have been non trivial changes in
>>> RAT
>>> management and for multiple geometry field support, but that only
>>> impacts core &
>>> drivers), and the C API and ABI is still preserved (for those who have
>>> looked at
>>> the other thread, my experiments on unification are *not* in trunk). For
>>> the
>>> details, I have initiated the preliminary NEWS :
>>> http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/export/27091/trunk/gdal/NEWS (*)
>>> There are some mentions to 2.0 in the documentation of new features, but
>>> I'll
>>> end up fixing them to reflect the 1.11 numbering.
>>>
>>> I think we are in a good shape to start the beta phase soon. If people
>>> have
>>> features or bug fixes almost ready that they'd like to be in 1.11,
>>> please speak
>>> up now. Otherwise I suggest issuing a beta-1 at the end of next week,
>>> give it a
>>> week for testing, and depending on the outcome, issue a beta-2, or just
>>> try
>>> RC-1. Unless someone volunteers (the process is fairly well documented in
>>> HOWTO-RELEASE), I can be release manager for 1.11.
>>>
>>> Any opinion about that plan ?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Even
>>>
>>> --
>>> Geospatial professional services
>>> http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gdal-dev mailing list
>>> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gdal-dev mailing list
>> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20140328/4bf2d1c0/attachment.html>