[gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification
Frank Warmerdam
warmerdam at pobox.com
Thu May 15 19:02:39 PDT 2014
Even,
I have (finally) looked over the RFC and I'm super pleased. I couldn't
find anything I wanted to argue against, and it all looks excellent to me
though I could imagine some some bumps in real world use.
Feel free to call for a motion when you are ready.
Best regards,
Frank
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Even Rouault <even.rouault at mines-paris.org
> wrote:
> Le jeudi 08 mai 2014 00:13:22, Even Rouault a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a call for discussion on "RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification"
> >
> > http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc46_gdal_ogr_unification
> >
>
> No reaction : no interest or no time to review yet ?
> Or should I move that forward ?
> But I'd prefer if such architectural changes could be a bit reviewed...
>
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Even
>
> --
> Geospatial professional services
> http://even.rouault.free.fr/services.html
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
--
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam,
warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush | Geospatial Software Developer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20140515/eab1073a/attachment.html>
More information about the gdal-dev
mailing list