[gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 46 : GDAL/OGR unification

Etienne Tourigny etourigny.dev at gmail.com
Mon May 19 18:14:08 PDT 2014


+1 from me


On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Jukka Rahkonen
<jukka.rahkonen at mmmtike.fi>wrote:

> Even Rouault <even.rouault <at> mines-paris.org> writes:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think that the points raised in the discussion have been answered. I've
> just
> > done a minor edit to the RFC text to mention RFC 36, as rightly
> suggested by
> > Ivan.
> >
> > So:
> >
> > Motion : I move to adopt RFC 46: GDAL/OGR unification
> >
> >     http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc46_gdal_ogr_unification
> >
> > Starting with my +1
>
> +0 because RFC goes too deeply into the code for me but I trust that Even
> has a good intention.
>
> -Jukka Rahkonen-
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20140519/efa87b84/attachment.html>


More information about the gdal-dev mailing list