[gdal-dev] OpenJPEG driver

[Jukka Rahkonen]

SAVINAUD Mickaël <mickael.savinaud <at> c-s.fr> writes:


> > IMHO the test case seems to be a bit too artificial to justify any change,
> > unless there are real world cases where that would cause issues.
> >
> Yes it is not a real case but it is a conformance data which allow to  
> define if a decoder is JPEG decoding compliant. It helps to verify  
> that real less complicated case will be handled properly. For example  
> we can see that JP2ECW is not compliant about this point.

Is it a right place to run such tests with GDAL? I understand that JPEG2000
SDKs should pass the tests but isn't GDAL working one step further when it
is utilizing the data ripped off the j2k codestreams?

-Jukka Rahkonen-