[gdal-dev] Public XYM or XYZM datasets?
Ari Jolma
ari.jolma at gmail.com
Tue Aug 30 06:35:59 PDT 2016
I think you need to select "DIGIROAD" on the left first. Then you should
get something like
> Hi,
>
> Your selected digiroad data sets from the Finnish Transport Agency are
> available at the following link:
> https://extranet.liikennevirasto.fi/livi/digiroad/Maakuntajako_DIGIROAD_K_EUREF-FIN/UUSIMAA.zip
> https://extranet.liikennevirasto.fi/livi/digiroad/Maakuntajako_DIGIROAD_R_EUREF-FIN/UUSIMAA.zip
>
>
> The download link is valid for 10 days. For further information,please
> contact us at
> Paikkatieto at liikennevirasto.fi
> Do not reply to this email.
> Thank you for your order!
>
> The data set descriptions are available at:
> http://www.liikennevirasto.fi/avoindata/tietoaineistot
>
> Digiroad materialföljebrev hittas pÄ Digiroads hemsida:
> http://www.digiroad.fi/dokumentit/sv_SE/foljebrev/
It seems that these shapefiles have M:
1: DR_LINKKI (3D Measured Line String)
1: DR_NOPEUSRAJOITUS (3D Measured Line String)
1: DR_SUURIN_SALLITTU_AKSELIMASSA (3D Measured Line String)
1: DR_SUURIN_SALLITTU_KORKEUS (3D Measured Line String)
1: DR_SUURIN_SALLITTU_MASSA (3D Measured Line String)
1: DR_SUURIN_SALLITTU_PITUUS (3D Measured Line String)
1: DR_SUURIN_SALLITTU_TELIMASSA (3D Measured Line String)
1: DR_VALAISTU_TIE (3D Measured Line String)
1: DR_YHDISTELMAN_SUURIN_SALLITTU_MASSA (3D Measured Line String)
Sorry, in Finnish. For example "DR_NOPEUSRAJOITUS" probably has the
speed limit on the road as M.
Ari
30.08.2016, 16:27, Jaak Laineste kirjoitti:
>
>
> It looks like I get only one link with some selected layers. Which
> layers are worth to try?
>
> /Your selected spatial data sets from the Finnish Transport Agency are
> available at the following link:
> https://extranet.liikennevirasto.fi/livi/inspire-downloads/41...zip
>
> The download link is valid for 10 days. For further information,please
> contact us at
> /
>
> Jaak
>> On 29 Aug 2016, at 08:15, Ari Jolma <ari.jolma at gmail.com
>> <mailto:ari.jolma at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> In the download email you should have K and R data set options (two
>> URLs). Only R has measured geometries.
>>
>> Ari
>>
>>
>> 29.08.2016, 01:43, Carl Godkin kirjoitti:
>>> Thank you very much for the response. (This isn't the first time
>>> I've found great example data from Finland, by the way. When I was
>>> experimenting with Lidar data a few years ago I found that Finland's
>>> collection was enormous!)
>>>
>>> However, I can't see what you mean by the "R" data. I selected
>>> various "Map Layers" and downloaded a few random shapefiles and none
>>> had "Measured" geometry (according to ogrinfo).
>>>
>>> Thanks for your help. Sorry if this is a dumb question!
>>>
>>> carl
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Ari Jolma <ari.jolma at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:ari.jolma at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The Finnish national road data was my motivation to add M to OGR.
>>>
>>> You can download it from
>>>
>>> https://extranet.liikennevirasto.fi/extranet/web/public/latauspalvelu
>>> <https://extranet.liikennevirasto.fi/extranet/web/public/latauspalvelu>
>>>
>>> The page is also in English (click EN on top left)
>>>
>>> The "R" data is the one you want.
>>>
>>> The meta data etc is probably in Finnish only so you may need to
>>> experiment. M values are used to encode point-like attribute
>>> data into the line strings.
>>>
>>> Good luck,
>>>
>>> Ari
>>>
>>>
>>> 26.08.2016, 01:43, Carl Godkin kirjoitti:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> While I had read about XYM and XYZM on the mailing list a few
>>>> months ago, I had no experience with those geometry types until
>>>> today when I happened to stumble on
>>>>
>>>> http://www-static.bouldercolorado.gov/docs/opendata/OSMPTrails.zip
>>>> <http://www-static.bouldercolorado.gov/docs/opendata/OSMPTrails.zip>
>>>>
>>>> which contains a shapefile of trails around Boulder, Colorado
>>>> that has
>>>> Geometry: Measured Line String
>>>> in GDAL 2.1's ogrinfo.
>>>>
>>>> I would like to find some other datasets with XYM (and/or XYZM)
>>>> geometry for testing.
>>>>
>>>> I didn't see any associated with the RFC or tickets associated
>>>> with it.
>>>>
>>>> Can anyone point me to any others? Thanks very much,
>>>>
>>>> carl
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> gdal-dev mailing list
>>>> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>>>> <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev>
>>> _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing
>>> list gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>>> <http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gdal-dev mailing list
>>> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>> _______________________________________________ gdal-dev mailing list
>> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20160830/1e63a2ce/attachment.html>
More information about the gdal-dev
mailing list