[gdal-dev] GDAL raster processing library?

[jramm]

I can see where some similarities with other new and existing GDAL work could
be a blocker on this, but I also think this adds a a degree more flexibility
allowing potentially any kind of complex processing to be carried out
without worrying/bothering about boilerplate. 

It would be good to find some kind of middle ground where this flexibility
can be added in without duplicating other efforts?



--
View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/GDAL-raster-processing-library-tp5275948p5276078.html
Sent from the GDAL - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.