[gdal-dev] Poll: is Visual Studio 2013 support needed for GDAL 2.3 ?

[Kurt Schwehr]

And if you have a need for MSVC 2013, it would be good to a note or two of
why you can't use MSVC 2015 or newer.  I don't remember seeing any
requirements for MSVC 2013 in the RFC 68 discussions and the RFC states
that MSVC 2015 would be the new minimum required version.

I just took a pass at updating the supported compiler list.  Please add
more tested configs.  I mostly just wanted to get statements about
supporting old platforms out of there.

https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/SupportedCompilers

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> As you may have noticed from recent emails, support for C++11 in VS 2013
> is only partial and kind a bit of a pain to deal with
>
>
>
> I've created a poll to probe the community how much support for VS 2013 is
> seen as needed for GDAL 2.3
>
>
>
> Please cast your vote (doesn't require any account, open to any user /
> developer / whatever party with at least some interest in GDAL ) at
>
>
>
> http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=5a399ccfe4b04ebe73ddb454
>
>
>
> Voting opened until end of this week
>
>
>
> Even
>
>
>
> --
>
> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
>
> http://www.spatialys.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>



-- 
--
http://schwehr.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20171219/5da07c08/attachment-0001.html>