mateusz at loskot.net
Tue Feb 21 11:21:09 PST 2017
I always thought GEOS tests are dead simple based on lightweight runner.
If something is missing, just add it and submit to GEOS.
Rewriting tests just for the sake of making them based on GTest.
On 21 Feb 2017 8:10 p.m., "Kurt Schwehr" <schwehr at gmail.com> wrote:
> The geos coverage is okay, but I have a hard time working with it. I've
> mostly been putting tests for libs that GDAL can be dependent on for lack
> of another place to put them as I can push the code.
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Mateusz Loskot <mateusz at loskot.net>
>> On 21 February 2017 at 14:01, Mateusz Loskot <mateusz at loskot.net> wrote:
>> > Kurt Schwehr-2 wrote
>> >> Well, it would be great if the GDAL community wants to merge that code.
>> > +1 - I'd welcome it
>> Is re-writing tests of GDAL dependencies part of the big plan?
>> AFAIK, GEOS is covered with tests pretty well.
>> Best regards.
>> Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
>> gdal-dev mailing list
>> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the gdal-dev