[gdal-dev] Gdal and Google's OSS Fuzzing project

Jesse McGraw jlmcgraw at gmail.com
Mon May 8 12:43:12 PDT 2017


Nice to see that I'm only 3 weeks behind the curve!

> On May 8, 2017, at 2:58 PM, Kurt Schwehr <schwehr at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Yup... https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/2017-April/046495.html
> 
> I'd be happy if anyone else wanted to take lead on it.
> 
> I've created https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/6883
> 
> Since I'm internal to google, I've been running some fuzzer targets against gdal behind the scenes and used the results to fix a number of bugs.  I've added a number of fuzz targets to https://github.com/schwehr/gdal-autotest2/tree/master/cpp and modified GDAL to make fuzzing more productive... e.g. 
> 
> https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/changeset/37592/ adds FUZZING_BUILD_MODE_UNSAFE_FOR_PRODUCTION to a driver
> https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/changeset/37909 example fix
> 
> I have ~50 bugs that I haven't gotten to.
> 
>> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Jesse McGraw <jlmcgraw at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think the gdal suite would be a perfect candidate for this project from google.  Is anyone interested in trying to integrate gdal into it?
>> 
>> https://opensource.googleblog.com/2017/05/oss-fuzz-five-months-later-and.html?m=1
>> _______________________________________________
>> gdal-dev mailing list
>> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> --
> http://schwehr.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20170508/4284a496/attachment.html>


More information about the gdal-dev mailing list