[gdal-dev] WCS driver
Ari Jolma
ari.jolma at gmail.com
Tue Oct 24 03:41:36 PDT 2017
Even Rouault kirjoitti 24.10.2017 klo 13:28:
>
> > The netcdf files I looked at through the GDAL driver had time and/or
>
> > depth offered as different gdal layers, and offered different variables
>
> > (i.e. different coverages) as subdatasets.
>
> Yes, although in the WCS case, a coverage can have several bands, and
> thus using the band mechanism to reflect the N>2 dimensions can become
> confusing.
>
Also in NetCDF the time dimension may be as bands - at least I have
marine research data which opens first as having two subdatasets (mean
and max wave height) and then as bands (the monthly values).
> The only clean solution to that would be to have a true
> multidimensional raster support at the GDAL API level, but that's a
> rather involved effort.
>
Above the division to subdatasets and bands seems arbitrary and perhaps
not user controllable. I agree it would be useful to have a better data
model in this respect.
Ari
> >
>
> > Which other GDAL drivers give direct access to time-varying raster
>
> > stacks in single files?
>
> I guess HDF5, as it is really close to netCDF.
>
> GRIB could potentially be used to have time-varying raster, although,
> from what I saw, generally you put instead different variables for the
> same forecast time in the same file. But technically you couldx just
> concatenate any amount of GRIB messages into a single file and this
> will be seen as a multi-band raster by GDAL.
>
> Even
>
> --
>
> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
>
> http://www.spatialys.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20171024/e85cfd1d/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the gdal-dev
mailing list