[gdal-dev] [Proposal] Move optional raw datasets to separate directory

thomas bonfort thomas.bonfort at gmail.com
Fri Feb 1 10:11:14 PST 2019


Le ven. 1 févr. 2019 à 18:10, Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com> a
écrit :

> (Re-adding the list)
>
> > > Is the split in 2 directories for aesthetic reasons, or because it
> makes
> > > the
> > > conditional compiling logic easier ?
> >
> > The latter. I'd like to avoid modifying the cpp files themselves to add
> > ifdefs to them.
>
> OK, I'm not clear why the split would change something in that respect. Or
> perhaps I misunderstood your proposals: would be the enabling/disabling
> compilation of raw drivers be for all raw drivers at a time, or per-driver
> ? I
> initially assumed the later, but guess this must be the former, given what
> you
> mention above. Not that I particularly care about either way, but just for
> the
> sake of my understanding.
>
yes correct, I was thinking of all raw drivers or none.

>
> >
> > > > raw/ would only contain rawdataset.cpp|h and would be a mandatory
> driver
> > > > (it is required by the vrt system)
> > So it could go to gcore ? That would have less overhead all-in-all.
>
> Indeed I was considering this as an option. There are a number of
> GNUmakefile/
> makefile.vc with -I../raw in them that could be cleaned up a bit then.
>
if that's ok with you I can incorporate that in #1250.


> --
> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
> http://www.spatialys.com
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20190201/95df400e/attachment.html>


More information about the gdal-dev mailing list