[gdal-dev] Trac Wiki (was: Closing remaining open Trac tickets ?)

[Mateusz Loskot]

Surely, ant page moved can be updated with link to its new home.
Bigger, IMHO, issue is to decide what's worth to be migrated.
Similar issue was with zillion-page Trac wiki of Boost project, where many
of pages where scratch notes, or incomplete/random garbage.

Mateusz Loskot, mateusz at loskot.net
(Sent from mobile)

On Thu, 21 Mar 2019, 15:39 Kurt Schwehr, <schwehr at gmail.com> wrote:

> If they are moved, can we put a redirect or at least leave a link to the
> new location?  I am sure there are a huge number of links on the interwebs
> to the wiki and it would be a major bummer to have those all go dead.
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019, 7:04 AM Mateusz Loskot <mateusz at loskot.net> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 12:45, Jeff McKenna
>> <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > I spent much effort
>> > to manually create all of the existing Trac wiki pages, onto Github, by
>> > hand (and then we made the Trac wiki read-only).  This should be done
>> > also for GDAL (but maybe now there is a more automated way).
>>
>> I have wondered what should be done about the Wiki pages too.
>> Do you think all pages qualify to be moved?
>>
>> Perhaps those up to date and important should be marked
>> w/ "TODO: Move to GitHub" first, then it will be clear what to move.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
>> _______________________________________________
>> gdal-dev mailing list
>> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20190321/bd257a30/attachment.html>