[gdal-dev] Transform produces different results from 2.2.4 and 3.0.2 or 3.0.3
Even Rouault
even.rouault at spatialys.com
Wed Jan 29 04:58:15 PST 2020
On mercredi 29 janvier 2020 05:11:10 CET mike Null wrote:
> Even, Carsten, thanks.
>
> Indeed I looked through what Even sent, and it worked. I did very much the
> same thing as the C# example you just posted.
>
> However it got me thinking. Will I need to do this in the future? Or are
> there plans for coordinate transformation to use the new axis ordering
> system?
It is up to you to decide if within your application you want to stick with
the not-so-well-defined 'traditional GIS order', or want to embrace natively
the axis order of the CRS you manipulate.
GDAL internally uses a mixed position regarding this. All the raster side uses
the OAMS_TRADITION_GIS_ORDER strategy. The vector side mostly defaults to it
too, except a few places like the GML driver if you specify the
INVERT_AXIS_ORDER_IF_LAT_LONG=NO open option
Even
--
Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
http://www.spatialys.com
More information about the gdal-dev
mailing list