[gdal-dev] Problems with latest pdfium

[William Kyngesburye]

Back to my question.  Does even 3.1 require the old pdfium fork?  This should be clarified in the GDAL PDF format page.

Is this fork keeping up with any security issues? (my guess is no since last commit is 5 years old.)

-----
William Kyngesburye
<kyngchaos at kyngchaos.com>
<http://www.kyngchaos.com>

Don't Panic

> On Jun 29, 2020, at 9:26 AM, William Kyngesburye <woklist at kyngchaos.com> wrote:
> 
> I'm compiling GDAL 3.1, the note says that only needs the patches.  It doesn't specify the source to use.
> 
> -----
> William Kyngesburye
> <kyngchaos at kyngchaos.com>
> <http://www.kyngchaos.com>
> 
> Don't Panic
> 
>> On Jun 29, 2020, at 4:34 AM, Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> William,
>> 
>>> I'm getting multiple errors trying to compile PDF support with pdfium.
>> 
>> See https://gdal.org/drivers/raster/pdf.html#pdfium
>> 
>> You need to build pdfium from the indicated forks.
>> 
>> Even
>> 
>> --
>> Spatialys - Geospatial professional services
>> http://www.spatialys.com