[gdal-dev] Retiring osgeo/gdal:alpine-ultra-small Docker image

[Kurt Schwehr]

+1 to match Howard's sentiment.

Unless someone steps up with a strong use case for why to keep it, I think
it should go.

I am curious if any of the alpine images are getting lots of use outside of
GDAL's CI testing.

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 7:20 AM Howard Butler <howard at hobu.co> wrote:

>
>
> > On Aug 25, 2021, at 12:34 PM, Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm considering retiring the osgeo/gdal:alpine-ultra-small Docker image.
> It's size difference with the osgeo/gdal:alpine-small one is small (50 MB
> vs 59 MB), and with arm64 images being now generated, the cross-compilation
> time for it becomes a bit painful. Any opposition to that?
>
> +1 for simpler and faster infrastructure
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20210826/32c8e6ae/attachment.html>