[gdal-dev] GDAL, Proj and cacert
Jeff McKenna
jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com
Fri Feb 11 12:43:33 PST 2022
On 2022-02-11 3:48 p.m., Howard Butler wrote:
>
>> On Feb 11, 2022, at 1:41 PM, Jeff McKenna
>> <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com <mailto:jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Unfortunately this issue comes up very often, as you said, so much of
>> our stack relies heavily on environment variables. My hope is that in
>> the long run, the ini-style of settings can help battle this Windows
>> Server x64 issue (yes googling this does return many
>> unproven/non-reproducible reports for other projects, very disheartening).
>
> The frustrations of how to pass environment variables in different
> computing environments is an issue that's orthogonal to how GDAL
> expresses configuration through environment variables. I get that the
> rules of environment variable resolution can be quite bespoke depending
> on the computing platform and environment you are operating on, but it's
> not legit to say "environment variables don't always work for me, we
> should do config files, but I don't have a reproducible test case to
> show that"
I agree here. But it's important to share and give thoughts, and by
having an open discussion I'm sure other packagers will keep an eye open
for such mysterious issues on Windows Server x64 with cacert environment
variables. (I hope to never see the issue reported again to me, ha)
-jeff
More information about the gdal-dev
mailing list