[gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 87: Signed int8 data type for raster
Even Rouault
even.rouault at spatialys.com
Wed Nov 16 08:38:54 PST 2022
Le 16/11/2022 à 17:32, Hermann Rodrigues a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I am a bit late for this discussion, but can someone please clarify if
> this is a breaking change? Is this keeping the old behavior in place
> when reading GDT_Byte or replacing it completely when reading rasters
> storing 8-bit pixels?
This doesn't affect GDT_Byte rasters that were really unsigned 8-bit pixels.
For signed 8-bit pixels,
https://gdal.org/development/rfc/rfc87_signed_int8.html#backward-compatibility
should answer your question
>
> Best,
>
> hermann
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Hermann Rodrigues
> hermann.rodrigues at gmail.com
> hermann at csr.ufmg.br
> Twitter: @horodrigues | @dinamica_ego
> Centro de Sensoriamento Remoto / UFMG
> https://csr.ufmg.br | https://dinamicaego.com
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 8:04 AM Even Rouault
> <even.rouault at spatialys.com> wrote:
>
> I declare this motion passed with +1 from PSC members KurtS, JukkaR,
> MateuszL and me.
>
> Even
>
> Le 14/11/2022 à 13:22, Even Rouault a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I feel the discussion phase has finished. There were a few
> questions
> > about the existing GDT_Byte unsigned 8-bit integer type, if it
> should
> > be renamed/aliased/etc, but no obvious conclusion emerged from
> this,
> > and I'd suggest we keep with the status-quo with GDT_Byte, and
> the RFC
> > remains on just adding GDT_Int8 for signed 8-bit integer.
> >
> > Motion:
> >
> > Adopt RFC 87: Signed int8 data type for raster
> > (https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/6634)
> >
> > Starting with my +1,
> >
> > Even
> >
> --
> http://www.spatialys.com
> My software is free, but my time generally not.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
--
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20221116/ffc7bd98/attachment.htm>
More information about the gdal-dev
mailing list