[gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC69 C/C++ Code Formatting
Kurt Schwehr
schwehr at gmail.com
Mon Nov 28 10:23:22 PST 2022
+1. Having the hooks makes this feasible.
Thank you for pickup the work that I let fall on the floor so long ago!
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 9:46 AM Javier Jimenez Shaw <j1 at jimenezshaw.com>
wrote:
> Yes, those are two different issues: attribution and "blame", that is
> really bothering when you want to see the history. Your comment reminded me
> that other.
>
> (Sorry for the format, I'm having problems with my phone)
>
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2022, 18:35 Even Rouault, <even.rouault at spatialys.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Le 28/11/2022 à 18:17, Javier Jimenez Shaw a écrit :
>>
>>
>> > About the blame problems, we can do this:
>> > https://akrabat.com/ignoring-revisions-with-git-blame/
>>
>> Regarding my mention of a dedicated account to do the big reformat, I
>> was more thinking to attribution statistics of
>> https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/graphs/contributors
>>
>>
>> Even
>>
>> --
>> http://www.spatialys.com
>> My software is free, but my time generally not.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20221128/27e4d305/attachment.htm>
More information about the gdal-dev
mailing list