[gdal-dev] Inconsistencies in WKT CRS representations

[Javier Jimenez Shaw]

https://crs-explorer.proj.org/ is using pyproj to generate all the
information, based on the last version of PROJ

In particular, your CRS is here:
https://crs-explorer.proj.org/?searchText=102022&ignoreWorld=false&allowDeprecated=false&authorities=EPSG,ESRI&activeTypes=PROJECTED_CRS

You have links to WKT1 and 2

Cheers,
Javier

On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 18:08, Howard Butler <howard at hobu.co> wrote:

>
>
> > On Aug 16, 2023, at 10:59 AM, Small, Jennifer L. (GSFC-618.0)[SCIENCE
> SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS INC] via gdal-dev <gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Is it best to represent the CRS with WKT rather than importing using
> SetFromUserInput with EPSG:code or ESRI:code? If so, what source has the
> definitive WKT, spatialreference.org or epsg.io?
>
> IMO, the definitive definition is 'projinfo'
>
> > projinfo ESRI:102022
>
> spatialreference.org has not been updated in many years and should be
> considered out of date. I don't know what version of PROJ epsg.io is
> running. https://epsg.org/ runs GDAL/PROJ too, but I don't know which
> version, and of course that isn't going to respond to ESRI codes.
>
> Hope this helps,
>
> Howard
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20230816/2dd16199/attachment.htm>