[gdal-dev] [Board] Travis usage of GRASS

[Robert Coup]

Hi,

For arm support, BuildJet hosts Github Actions arm64 runners
https://buildjet.com/for-github-actions/docs/runners — works well IME, and
doesn't require yet another CI system configuration. I don't know whether
there's any discounts/support for OSS projects.

Rob :)

On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 at 18:05, Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com>
wrote:

> 2 concurrent builds would probably be fine.
>
> (I also see we use s390x and Graviton2 for PROJ. It is sometimes useful
> because of subtle floating point differences that pop up and make the
> regression test suite fail. Easier to catch them at the time they are
> introduced rather that after release when the maintainer of a Linux
> distro which builds for all possible architectures reports a test
> failure in one of those archs to which you don't have easy access to)
>
> Le 14/02/2023 à 18:50, Michael Smith a écrit :
> > Even,
> >
> > If its actively being used, that’s fine. Was just re-evaluating after
> talking with Howard. Could we drop the concurrency down without impacting
> GDAL, GRASS and other projects?
> > And looks like I got the renewal dates swapped with mapserver. The OSGeo
> plan doesn’t renew until June. Right now we are on the:
> >
> > Premium plan 10 concurrent jobs with 30% discount.
> >
> > So if we do need to maintain, could we drop to 5 or 2 concurrent builds?
> >
> >
> > -
> > Michael Smith
> > OSGeo Treasurer
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Even Rouault <even.rouault at spatialys.com>
> > Date: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 at 10:38 AM
> > To: Michael Smith <michael.smith.erdc at gmail.com>, <wenzeslaus at gmail.com>,
> Markus Neteler <neteler at osgeo.org>, Veronica Andreo <veroandreo at gmail.com>
> > Cc: <board at lists.osgeo.org>, "gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org" <
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Board] Travis usage of GRASS
> >
> > Hi,
> > just reacting to "We were considering cancelling OSGeo’s subscription".
> For GDAL, our current use of Travis-CI is to test portability on the
> Graviton2 ARM64 and s390x big-endian platforms (we use github CI for x64
> Linux/Win/Mac). For Graviton2, this is more the ARM64 side of things than
> the Graviton2 specific one, as ARM64 is the architecture of recent Apple
> hardware and there's no corresponding workers for github CI (not sure if
> there free CI solutions that can be integrated with github and offer ARM64
> support?). s390x/big-endian use cases have probably little market relevance
> nowadays.
> > Even
> > Le 14/02/2023 à 18:26, Michael Smith via Board a écrit :
> > After not seeing any builds for a while in Travis from Grass, I just saw
> one recently.
> >
> > We were considering cancelling OSGeo’s subscription but if this is
> something GRASS is actively using/depending on, we can maintain. We might
> scale back the subscription if its only lightly used those. I have to renew
> on Feb 19 so if you could let me know before then.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> > -
> > Michael Smith
> > OSGeo Treasurer
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Board mailing list
> > mailto:Board at lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>
> --
> http://www.spatialys.com
> My software is free, but my time generally not.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20230215/8f9ca328/attachment.htm>