[gdal-dev] Call for review on RFC 101: Raster dataset read-only thread-safety

[Kurt Schwehr]

Thank you Even for this! I don't have any comments after a quick read
beyond appreciating that you discussed an alternative approach.

-Kurt

On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 5:27 AM Even Rouault via gdal-dev <
gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've worked on a new RFC 101: Raster dataset read-only thread-safety:
> https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/10676
>
> Summary: This RFC enables users to get instances of GDALDataset (and
> their related objects such as GDALRasterBand) that are thread-safe for
> read-only raster operations, that is such instances can be safely used
> from multiple threads without locking.
>
> It is backed by a preliminary implementation (fairly complete, apart
> from writing new tests...). There's at least one open question raised in
> the RFC.
>
> PS: you can see one of the benefits of the migration of the doc to
> ReadTheDocs hosting, with the preview of the updated documentation in
> pull requests. So this is a way to mention that the move to RtD hosting
> has now been completed, with the default version ("latest") reflecting
> the state of the master branch, as well as the version for the
> release/3.9 branch. Thanks to Dan Baston (and other people involved) for
> this work! There might be a few adjustments needed, so if you notice
> something unusual w.r.t. to the previous state, please file a ticket.
>
> Even
>
> --
> http://www.spatialys.com
> My software is free, but my time generally not.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20240831/7a2c09b2/attachment-0001.htm>