[gdal-dev] Call for discussion on RFC 100: Adding Float16 support to GDAL
Kurt Schwehr
schwehr at gmail.com
Thu Nov 7 10:33:13 PST 2024
But more importantly...
I should have started with saying thank you Erik for working on this RFC
for GDAL!
On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 10:30 AM Kurt Schwehr <schwehr at gmail.com> wrote:
> My first pass questions are:
>
> 1) For folks compiling with C++23*, can they use std::float16_t
> <https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/floating-point>? Sadly, that's
> not me yet as my environment is C++20.
>
> 2) For when C++23 is the minimum language version for GDAL, what is the
> plan?
>
> (*) https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/compiler_support/23
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2024 at 6:07 AM Even Rouault via gdal-dev <
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Le 05/11/2024 à 14:15, Erik Schnetter via gdal-dev a écrit :
>>
>> I am interested in GDAL supporting float16 values. My RFC 100 can be
>> viewed here: https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/10144 .
>>
>> ( above link is the issue discussing the need. Actual link to the RFC
>> text is at https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/10146 )
>>
>> -- http://www.spatialys.com
>> My software is free, but my time generally not.
>> Butcher of all kinds of standards, open or closed formats. At the end, this is just about bytes.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gdal-dev mailing list
>> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20241107/781affb1/attachment.htm>
More information about the gdal-dev
mailing list