[gdal-dev] Reprojecting image with lat/lon bands - best practice?
Javier Jimenez Shaw
j1 at jimenezshaw.com
Fri Oct 18 03:37:08 PDT 2024
Is it an actual grid? in the meaning of having constant step size in X and
Y.
In that case the geolocation is just the corner and the x and y sizes. You
can convert to a georeference raster, and warp it.
If it is not the case, you have something more like a 2D pointcloud, or a
bunch of poins in a strange vector format.
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 at 12:20, Conrad Bielski via gdal-dev <
gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
> Hello GDAL-experts,
>
> normally when I use GDAL for reprojecting imagery, the projection
> information that I use is the source spatial reference (SRS) associated
> with the imagery. However, now I have imagery which is lat/lon geographic
> and I have two separate bands which also carry the pixel geographic
> information. So the following raster inputs all the same size:
> 1. Band 1 = latitude
> 2. Band 2 = longitude
> 3. Band 3 = imagery
>
> The question I have is how best to integrate this information into a
> reprojection workflow?
>
> I presume that gdalwarp is the best option here, but how can I take
> advantage of the individual pixel location information (rather than just
> the extents for example)? I know that I can mosaic into an existing file
> that I have already created in the target projection. Is this the best way
> to apply gdalwarp in this context?
>
> I'm just wondering what is the best way to integrate the lat/lon pixel
> information into my warping using gdalwarp.
>
> Thanks in advance for your help,
> Conrad
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20241018/2595962d/attachment.htm>
More information about the gdal-dev
mailing list