[gdal-dev] Removing Trac wiki content

[Norman Barker]

+1 The old RFCs were useful but as you can get them from the wayback
machine that is fine.

On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 4:35 PM Daniel Baston via gdal-dev <
gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> +1
>
> Dan
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 3:34 PM Javier Jimenez Shaw via gdal-dev
> <gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
> >
> > I agree
> >
> > On Thu, 19 Sept 2024, 20:35 Even Rouault via gdal-dev, <
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I suggest we complete remove the content from
> >> https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki. At this point, it is totally outdated
> >> compared to gdal.org and useless for most people, and potentially
> >> causing confusion if someone reaches it. People who would need to access
> >> those outdated docs for their outdated GDAL builds can still use the
> >> wayback machine (I've verified it did a decent job at crawling it).
> >>
> >> Even
> >>
> >> --
> >> http://www.spatialys.com
> >> My software is free, but my time generally not.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> gdal-dev mailing list
> >> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gdal-dev mailing list
> > gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20240919/eb59ccaf/attachment.htm>