[gdal-dev] RFCs

[Even Rouault]

Hi Andrew,

Can you be more specific about which RFCs ?  Quick grep shows RFC9 
superseded per RFC83 and RFC68 superseded per RFC98.

If that can help, we could potentially keep in master a mostly empty 
document for superseded RFCs that would contain just a link to the new 
RFC and a link to the supersed text pointing at 
https://gdal.org/en/release-{last-one-with-the-full-text}/development/rfc/rfc-XXXX.html

Even

Le 14/05/2025 à 19:45, Andrew Bell via gdal-dev a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering if some of the RFCs should be placed somewhere other 
> than on the web site because they are obsolete/superseded. I think 
> this would make it easier to find relevant current information. Some 
> of the RFCs are marked as superseded, but from the standpoint of a web 
> search, the more there is to read through, the less likely that I'll 
> find the correct information that I'm looking for.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -- 
> Andrew Bell
> andrew.bell.ia at gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev

-- 
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20250514/95eb778a/attachment.htm>