[gdal-dev] Call for review on RFC 109: Split of gdal_priv.h and addition of gdal_cpp.h header

[Andrew Bell]

Even,

Not sure I understand this. Do you have an example?

"Does the content of :file:`gdal_cpp.h` must target only the GDAL "classic
2D" and
  multidimensional C++ API, or also the C++ vector API ?

On Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 3:20 PM Even Rouault via gdal-dev <
gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Please review https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/13071 : Split of
> gdal_priv.h and addition of gdal_cpp.h header
>
> Summary:
>
> This RFC splits the content of gdal_priv.h, the installed header
> containing declaration for GDAL (raster) C++ classes, into finer grain
> exported headers. It also adds a new gdal_cpp.h exported header, which
> is essentially the content of current gdal_priv.h header, but with a
> more engaging name. Those changes are done in a fully backward
> compatible way: current external users of gdal_priv.h will not have any
> change to do in their source code.
>
> Even
>
> --
> http://www.spatialys.com
> My software is free, but my time generally not.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>


-- 
Andrew Bell
andrew.bell.ia at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20250916/c1b2f4e7/attachment.htm>