[gdal-dev] Call for review: RFC111: AI/LLM tool policy

[Kurt Schwehr]

It looks pretty good to me.

One comment:

What about an AI that autonomously finds bugs that trigger sanitizers that
are verifiable like OSS Fuzz does?

Because I had to... I asked Gemini to review the proposal and I did it 3
ways plus the last time I ask for a general community overview. I ran out
of steam reading the responses half way through the 4th iteration.
Apologies for the wonky formatting. No, I don't expect anybody to read the
results, but you are welcome to.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vRVL12Vx73MD3tqX7gSAKd6l9DksH9AL3owS_BRZyyjbNhCHwHLZze6huq-nCXF60WW9pDzqYX42HSy/pub

-Kurt

On Mon, Feb 9, 2026 at 10:24 AM Even Rouault via gdal-dev <
gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org> wrote:

> >
> > Looks good to me. My only suggestion is maybe we want some automated
> comments driven by assigning labels to help us manage and post standard
> responses on all this kind of content we seem to be getting.
>
> yes we should be able to do that with
>
> https://docs.github.com/actions/tutorials/manage-your-work/add-comments-with-labels
>
>
> --
> http://www.spatialys.com
> My software is free, but my time generally not.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gdal-dev mailing list
> gdal-dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20260209/9bd96725/attachment.htm>