[gdal-dev] Tightening AI based submission policy
Daniel Baston
dbaston at gmail.com
Tue Oct 20 06:59:21 PDT 2026
>
> I think I understand your comments but I'm having trouble with "and thus
> it's ok".
>
I'm just saying that the original proposal intends to reduce a burden on
maintainers, and I don't see how it accomplishes that. There may be other
reasons to rework the AI policy, but that wasn't what I thought this thread
was about. And of course, updating and debating the policy every few months
is a cost in of itself.
Dan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/gdal-dev/attachments/20261020/be3bd152/attachment.htm>
More information about the gdal-dev
mailing list