Frank,<br><br>the new version of FWTools downloaded today still doesn't solve this bug reported. I used gdal_1.4.0beta2 newly released along with gdal_merge.py to compose using "-pct" option and the same satellite input images, but I still get a black image.
<br>The 2 files I am trying to compose can be found in: <br><a href="http://www.mediamax.com/izzybitsie/Hosted/AS_GMSSO_00_20061122205634.tif" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">http://www.mediamax.com/izzybitsie/Hosted/AS_GMSSO_00_20061122205634.tif
</a><br><span class="q"></span><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://www.mediamax.com/izzybitsie/Hosted/AS_GMSNO_00_20061122205548.tif.gz" target="_blank">http://www.mediamax.com/izzybitsie/Hosted/AS_GMSNO_00_20061122205548.tif.gz
</a><br><br>Thanks<br><br>Happy Holidays!!!!!<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 12/7/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Frank Warmerdam</b> <<a href="mailto:warmerdam@pobox.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
warmerdam@pobox.com</a>> wrote:
</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Dori wrote:<br>> Frank,<br>><br>> I will report the bug if you tell me what exactly I should report as the
<br>> bug. Is it the fact that the library is counting on Geotiffs to be<br>> created with the proper TIFF color table?<br>><br>> I really think this is a problem with the type of input maps I am using.<br>> I was assured by the third party software company used to generate the
<br>> input maps that their gtiffs were compliant with: Geotiff version 1.0<br>> specification<br>> (<a href="http://www.remotesensing.org/geotiff/spec/geotiffhome.html" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">
http://www.remotesensing.org/geotiff/spec/geotiffhome.html
</a>) after I<br>> asked them about the differences for image info I got using gdal and<br>> imagemagick for the input images.<br><br>Isadora,<br><br>The problem is not the geotiff tags, but an aspect of the underyling
<br>TIFF. The bug looks fine. I'll try and have it fixed by the next<br>GDAL 1.4.0 beta (hopefully with a corresponding FWTools release).<br><br>Best regards,<br>--<br>---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
<br>I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, <a href="mailto:warmerdam@pobox.com" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">warmerdam@pobox.com</a><br>light and sound - activate the windows |
<a href="http://pobox.com/%7Ewarmerdam" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
</a><br>and watch the world go round - Rush | President OSGeo, <a href="http://osgeo.org" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">http://osgeo.org</a><br><br></blockquote></div><br>