<br><br><div style="visibility: hidden; display: inline;" id="avg_ls_inline_popup"></div><style type="text/css">#avg_ls_inline_popup { position:absolute; z-index:9999; padding: 0px 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-top: 0px; width: 240px; overflow: hidden; word-wrap: break-word; color: black; font-size: 10px; text-align: left; line-height: 13px;}</style><div class="gmail_quote">
2010/6/9 GeoSpatial - Kevin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gs.kevin1@gmail.com">gs.kevin1@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Has someone already documented the performance difference between x32 and x64 versions of the FWTools / gdal? Improvement by how much? Many thanks.<br><font color="#888888"><br></font></blockquote><div><br>Kevin,<br><br>I don't expect too much difference in performance, and I'm not aware of any compare results. However one can do a compare by using the packages from <a href="http://vbkto.dyndns.org/sdk/">http://vbkto.dyndns.org/sdk/</a> which have been compiled by using the same settings for x86 and x64. Any feedback on the experiences are highly appreciated.<br>
<br>Best regards,<br><br>Tamas<br><br></div></div><br>