<div class="gmail_quote">2011/11/27 Even Rouault <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:even.rouault@mines-paris.org">even.rouault@mines-paris.org</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">
</div><br>Hum, when I say *exact*, I really mean *exact* ... And what is interesting is<br>
the first error emitted by the SRP driver, not the last one in higher layers.<br>
<div class="im"><br></div></blockquote><div><div class="im"></div>I don't remember all errors but the the first two errors from gdalinfo
are wrong value G and wrong value E. Names of my files are ok but i
didn't check if names was correctly put as data into files. I will get errors
tomorrow. <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"></blockquote><div> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">
><br>
> As you say Ari, read files with errors is not a good thing. But the<br>
> question for the programmer (like me) is : don't read a map if there is<br>
> just a litlle error in one file or read a map even if there is an error but<br>
> the raster and data like width, height and georeferencing are readable.<br>
> In my case i have to read these maps. And i'd preffered to load it in the<br>
> dataset java class than get informations with the gdalinfo.exe and build a<br>
> vrt with Gdalbuildvrt.exe<br>
<br>
</div>Yes if the file is visually OK (is it the case here ?), then errors should<br>
probably reclassified as warnings.<br></blockquote><div><br>The visual is ok with Qgis. And it works perfectly when i build a vrt file with Gdalbuildvrt from my *.img and make tiles with Gdal_translate.<br></div></div><br>