GDAL autotests are looking good on Win64. Futher tests are welcome.<div><br></div><div>Best regards,</div><div><br></div><div>Tamas</div><div><br></div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2012/1/2 Etienne Tourigny <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:etourigny.dev@gmail.com">etourigny.dev@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">What is the status of Windows 32-bit and 64-bit ? Have they been<br>
tested outside of Tamas' build bot?<br>
<br>
best wishes for 2012,<br>
<font color="#888888">Etienne<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Even Rouault<br>
<<a href="mailto:even.rouault@mines-paris.org">even.rouault@mines-paris.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> Le dimanche 01 janvier 2012 02:38:00, Frank Warmerdam a écrit :<br>
>> Motion: To promote the GDAL/OGR 1.9.0RC1 release candidate as<br>
>> the final GDAL/OGR 1.9.0 release.<br>
>><br>
><br>
> I've managed to compile it (or the betas) on a variety of Unixes (CentOS 6.2,<br>
> Ubuntu 11.10, FreeBSD 8.0, NetBSD 5, OpenBSD 4.5, Solaris 10 and 11, Debian<br>
> Lenny on a big-endian host) and things seem to be in good shape.<br>
><br>
> Has anyone tested on MacOS X ?<br>
><br>
> The only regression I've found so far is in the Rasterlite driver ( fixed in<br>
> <a href="http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4413" target="_blank">http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4413</a> ). It was hidden by another problem in<br>
> the lastest libspatialite3.0.0 that was exhibited by the GDAL autotests. But I<br>
> don't think it justifies another RC per se.<br>
><br>
> *Last minute* : I've just tested with CentOS 4.7 and CentOS 5.6 and I've found<br>
> a compilation problem with the sqlite driver (and in the GML driver when<br>
> sqlite3 support is available). Those 2 OS ship with sqlite 3.3.6, but we now<br>
> use various methods that weren't yet available. This is now fixed in trunk and<br>
> 1.9 branch (see <a href="http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4418" target="_blank">http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4418</a> for details ). Not sure<br>
> if it is worth a RC2.<br>
><br>
> Best regards,<br>
><br>
> Even<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> gdal-dev mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org">gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
gdal-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org">gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev" target="_blank">http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>