<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
I'd like to ask the PSC and others to vote on adopting RFC 61:
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
Support for measured geometries.<br>
<br>
The draft RFC is at <br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc61_support_for_measured_geometries">https://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc61_support_for_measured_geometries</a><br>
<br>
and a draft implementation is at<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://github.com/ajolma/GDAL-XYZM">https://github.com/ajolma/GDAL-XYZM</a><br>
<br>
which is tested at<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://travis-ci.org/ajolma/GDAL-XYZM">https://travis-ci.org/ajolma/GDAL-XYZM</a><br>
<br>
(the test #34, which passed, was the so far last one after core
changes with unchanged autotests and a rather comprehensive set of
WKT tests in the Perl tests directory)<br>
<br>
This is seemingly a small change but it is at the heart of OGR so it
has some important implications. The only backwards
incompatibilities that have appeared so far are with some drivers,
for example shapefile, which can be lessened with, e.g., open
options.<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
<br>
Ari<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>