<div dir="ltr">The geos coverage is okay, but I have a hard time working with it.  I've mostly been putting tests for libs that GDAL can be dependent on for lack of another place to put them as I can push the code.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Mateusz Loskot <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mateusz@loskot.net" target="_blank">mateusz@loskot.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On 21 February 2017 at 14:01, Mateusz Loskot <<a href="mailto:mateusz@loskot.net">mateusz@loskot.net</a>> wrote:<br>
> Kurt Schwehr-2 wrote<br>
>> Well, it would be great if the GDAL community wants to merge that code.<br>
><br>
> +1 - I'd welcome it<br>
<br>
</span>Is re-writing tests of GDAL dependencies part of the big plan?<br>
<a href="https://github.com/schwehr/gdal-autotest2/commit/e65e6d5aa03753c4b9a67e2cec6a8bdbe0997a80" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/schwehr/<wbr>gdal-autotest2/commit/<wbr>e65e6d5aa03753c4b9a67e2cec6a8b<wbr>dbe0997a80</a>)<br>
<br>
AFAIK, GEOS is covered with tests pretty well.<br>
<br>
Best regards.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">--<br>
Mateusz Loskot, <a href="http://mateusz.loskot.net" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mateusz.loskot.net</a><br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
gdal-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org">gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.osgeo.org/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev</a></div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">--<div><a href="http://schwehr.org" target="_blank">http://schwehr.org</a></div></div>
</div>