<html dir="ltr">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<style id="owaParaStyle">P {
MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN-TOP: 0px
}
</style>
</head>
<body fPStyle="1" ocsi="0">
<div style="direction: ltr;font-family: Tahoma;color: #000000;font-size: 10pt;">
<p style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">Hi list,</p>
<p style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"> </p>
<p style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">I am using gdal 2.2.3. I see that there is a GDAL driver for Sentinel-1 'manifest.safe' and I tested it against the tough case of the SLC (complex).</p>
<p style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">These SLC products consists of three HH-HV dual-pol images. They only overlap ~2 to 3% at the edges. W<span style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">hen I load the *.tiff one-by-one in OpenEV viewer.</span></p>
<p style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">However when I load the 'manifest.safe' in OpenEV viewer, GDAL georeferencing is wrong. Three GTiff images are overlapped almost 100%. <span style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">When I run 'gdalinfo manifest.safe', the results only show GCPs from
the 3rd image (s1a-iw3-slc-vh-########-003.tiff).</span></p>
<p style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"> </p>
<p style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">When the Sentinel-1 was developed, were SLC cases tested?
</p>
<p style="FONT-SIZE: 13px"> </p>
<p style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">Also the new RCM is going to use the 'manifest.safe' file too. There could be a conflict, if file name 'manifest.safe' is used to identify the sensors.</p>
<div style="FONT-SIZE: 13px">
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2">
<div class="PlainText"> </div>
</font></div>
</div>
<div DanaPrelude="1">
<div style="FONT-SIZE: 13px; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma">
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><font face="Tahoma">
<div class="PlainText"></font> </div>
<div class="PlainText"><font face="Tahoma">Thanks,<br>
Shawn<br>
</div>
</font></font></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>