<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
Hi Frank,<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CA+YzLBfCM5Naezt-PT+EykFDQuNKeYuF2mg4iVJBVcLiaQEOEw@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">I'm
not a huge GoogleTest fan but then I'm also not saying it
*worse* than any alternative, but the reasons are reasonably
convincing, and I'm happy if those running and contributing
tests are happy! <br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Just curious what you don't like with GoogleTest ?<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CA+YzLBfCM5Naezt-PT+EykFDQuNKeYuF2mg4iVJBVcLiaQEOEw@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,sans-serif">Should
I understand from the RFC that <a
href="https://github.com/rouault/gdal/tree/gtest"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://github.com/rouault/gdal/tree/gtest</a>
implements the migration? (ie. we have already done the work
to migrate, we just need to agree on it?)</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes the implementation is ready in
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/6732">https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/6732</a> . I find it more
convincing when there's an implementation backing a RFC (it was
partial when I submitted the RFC and I finished it as the initial
feedback was positive)<br>
</p>
<p>Even<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.spatialys.com">http://www.spatialys.com</a>
My software is free, but my time generally not.</pre>
</body>
</html>