<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Michael,</p>
<p>I don't think this would be a frmts/raw driver, but rather a
/vsikerchunk virtual file system that you would combine with the
Zarr driver</p>
<p>So you would open a dataset with "/vsikerchunk/{path/to.json}",
and the ZARR driver would then issue a ReadDir() operation on
/vsikerchunk/{path/to.json}, which would return the top level keys
of the JSON. Then the Zarr driver would issue a Open() operation
on "/vsikerchunk/{path/to.json}/.zmetadata", and so on. The Zarr
driver could be essentially unmodified. This is I believe
essentially how the Python implementation works when combining the
Kerchunk specific part with the Python Zarr module (except it
passes file system objects and not strings).<br>
</p>
<p>Where things don't get pretty is for big datasets, where that
JSON file can become so big that parsing it and holding it in
memory becomes an annoyance. They have come apparently to using a
hierarchy of Parquet files to store the references to the blocks:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://fsspec.github.io/kerchunk/spec.html#parquet-references">https://fsspec.github.io/kerchunk/spec.html#parquet-references</a> .
That's becoming a bit messy. Should be implementable though</p>
<p>There are also subtelties in Kerchunk v1 with jinja substitution,
and generators of keys, all tricks to decrease the size of the
JSON, that would complicate an implementation.<br>
</p>
<p>On Kerchunk itself, I don't have any experience, but I feel there
might be limitations to what it can handle due to the underlying
raster formats. For example, if you have a GeoTIFF file using JPEG
compression, with the quantization tables being stored in the TIFF
JpegTables tag (i.e. shared for all tiles), which is the
formulation that GDAL would use by default on creation, then I
don't see how Kerchunk can deal with that, since that would be 2
distincts chunks in the file, and the recombination is slightly
more complicated than just appending them together before passing
them to a JPEG codec. Similarly if you wanted to Kerchunk a
GeoPackage raster, you couldn't, because a single tile in SQLite3
generally spans over multiple SQLite3 pages (of size 4096), with a
few "header" bytes at the beginning of each tile. For GRIB2, there
are certainly limitations to some formulations because some GRIB2
encoding for arrays are really particular. It must work only with
the most simple raw encoding.<br>
</p>
<p>Kerchunk can potentially do virtual tiling, but I believe that
all tiles must have the same dimensions, and their internal tiling
to be a multiple of that dimension, so you can create a Zarr
compatible representation of them.</p>
<p>And obviously one strong assumption of Kerchunk is that the files
referenced by a Kerchunk index are immutable. If for some reason,
tiles are moved internally because of updates, chaos will arise
due to (offset, size) tuples being out of sync.<br>
</p>
<p>Even<br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 24/07/2024 à 00:37, Michael Sumner
via gdal-dev a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAAcGz99qQow2Y-h2XeNM0nAckipio4-cNN4P5_eyyHTfk+VY4g@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">Hi, is there any effort or thought into
something like Python's kerchunk in GDAL? (my summary of
kerchunk is below)
<div><br>
</div>
<div><a href="https://github.com/fsspec/kerchunk"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://github.com/fsspec/kerchunk</a><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>I'll be exploring the python outputs in detail and
looking for hooks into where we might bring some of this
tighter into GDAL. This would work nicely inside the GTI
driver, for example. But, a *kerchunk-driver*? That would
be in the family of raw/ drivers, my skillset won't have
much to offer but I'm going to explore with some simpler
examples. It could even bring old HDF4 files into the
fold, I think. </div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>It's a bit weird from a GDAL perspective to map the chunks
in a format for which we have a driver, but there's definitely
performance advantages and convenience for virtualizing huge
disparate collections (even the simplest time-series-of-files
in netcdf is nicely abstracted here for xarray, a
super-charged VRT for xarray). </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Interested in any thoughts, feedback, pointers to related
efforts ... thanks! </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>(my take on) A description of kerchunk: </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>kerchunk replaces the actual binary blobs on file in a Zarr
with json references to a file/uri/object and the byte start
and end values, in this way kerchunk brings formats like
hdf/netcdf/grib into the fold of "cloud readiness" by having a
complete separation of metadata from the actual storage. The
information about those chunks (compression, type, orientation
etc is stored in json also). </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>(a Zarr is a multidimensional version of a
single-zoom-level image tiling, imagine every image tile as a
potentially n-dimensional child block of a larger array. The
blobs are stored like one zoom of an z/y/x tile server
[[[v/]w/]y/]x way (with a position for each dimension of the
array, 1, 2, 3, 4, or n, and z is not special, and with more
general encoding possibilities than tif/png/jpeg provide.)
This scheme is extremely general, literally a virtualized
array-like abstraction on any storage, and with kerchunk you
can transcend many legacy issues with actual formats. <br
clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Cheers, Mike</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<span class="gmail_signature_prefix">-- </span><br>
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"
data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">Michael Sumner<br>
Research Software Engineer<br>
Australian Antarctic Division<br>
Hobart, Australia<br>
e-mail: <a href="mailto:mdsumner@gmail.com"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">mdsumner@gmail.com</a></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
gdal-dev mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org">gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev">https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.spatialys.com">http://www.spatialys.com</a>
My software is free, but my time generally not.</pre>
</body>
</html>