[Geodata] [Tiger] A few interesting observations on the
Tiger2007fedata
Stephen Frost
sfrost at snowman.net
Wed Aug 6 17:21:47 EDT 2008
Stephen, et al,
* Stephen Woodbridge (woodbri at swoodbridge.com) wrote:
> It is also important to note here that the zipcode info in Census is by
> and large circa 1990 when the Census last used the USPS Zip+4 database
> and did a mass merge/update of Tiger. This has an impact in a couple of
> ways:
Census has their seperate ZCTA system, but I don't believe that
means that the detailed per-segment Zip codes aren't ever updated.. It
would be easy enough to check (not that I have) obviously, by looking at
a recently added zip code and checking to find it in the latest Census
data anywhere. I had thought that the Zip codes were updated as part of
the MAF improvment process at the detailed edge level though.
Just a thought.
Thanks,
Stephen
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geodata/attachments/20080806/9e404dc6/attachment.bin
More information about the Geodata
mailing list