[Ica-osgeo-labs] Defining criteria for REL membership

[Mueller, Thomas]

Hello

My hope is to join Geo4all this fall semester.  I have a little work to do at my university first.  

Tom Mueller


Sent from my iPad

> On Jun 2, 2015, at 6:36 AM, "Suchith Anand" <Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> Dimitris ,
> 
> Thank you for these excellent points. (And thanks Charlie for the interesting article reference).
> 
> Yes, participation itself in a global network with excellent people is the biggest benifit for all (those active and those not that active). We need to find mechanisms to encourage  and help those not that active to be more involved and active.
> 
> I also agree that the very  simple reporting suggested is just for understanding the bigger picture of the community and encourage more collaboration opportunities but not to be used as a criterion to continue someone's participation ( in fact, we can use this opportunity to help those who need more support).  Cameron and others who have great experience with success of OSGeo Live can give us more ideas to help us.
> 
> Suchith
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: ica-osgeo-labs-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [ica-osgeo-labs-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Charles Schweik [cschweik at pubpol.umass.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 11:12 AM
> To: Dimitris Kotzinos
> Cc: ica-osgeo-labs at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [Ica-osgeo-labs] Defining criteria for REL membership
> 
> +1
> 
> One of my favorite quotes by open source advocate Eric Raymond is below, and relevant:
> 
> '... the number of contributors (and, at second order, the success of) projects is strongly and inversely correlated with the number of hoops each project makes a contributing user go through.' [1]
> 
> [1] http://timreview.ca/article/645
> 
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Dimitris Kotzinos <kotzino at gmail.com<mailto:kotzino at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> I followed the exchange of e-mails on "advancing" the requirements for
> participating in the GeoForAll, beyond just checking for inactivity.
> I think that we should try to keep things simple; actually I think that
> one of the points of the unprecedented success and growth the network
> has seen, is based on the fact that things have been kept simple and not
> very demanding in terms of time. I think the important point is to keep
> people interested and involved. The many good people that already
> participate and are active guarantee the growth of the network. If
> someone is not very active in my view should be encouraged and helped
> (as Suchith suggested) and not be thrown out or e.g. in incubation. We
> have to consider also how valuable such participation is for
> universities from developing countries, both in terms of best practices
> and materials.
> For me the main benefit of participation, is ... participation itself in
> a global network with excellent people submitting proposals like the
> ones by Charlie or Maria and while as usual few people will drive the
> initiatives the more that participate the better it is.
> Needless to say that some simple reporting is more than welcome for
> understanding the bigger picture of the community but not to be used as
> a criterion to continue someone's participation. In practical terms we
> can always poke people from time to time to understand if they want to
> continue being part or not as Helena did now (thanks Helena).
> 
> So let's try to hit the 100 members mark!
> 
> Best regards to all,
> Dimitris
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ica-osgeo-labs mailing list
> ica-osgeo-labs at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:ica-osgeo-labs at lists.osgeo.org>
> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ica-osgeo-labs
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Charlie Schweik
> 
> Associate Professor, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
> Dept of Environmental Conservation and Center for Public Policy and Administration
> 
> Personal website: http://people.umass.edu/cschweik
> Publications: http://works.bepress.com/charles_schweik/
> 
> Author, Internet Success: A Study of Open Source Software (MIT Press, 2012) - see http://tinyurl.com/d3e4545
> 
> --------------------------------------------
> Q: Why is this email five sentences or less?
> A: http://five.sentenc.es
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. 
> 
> Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
> message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
> author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
> University of Nottingham.
> 
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
> computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
> permitted by UK legislation.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ica-osgeo-labs mailing list
> ica-osgeo-labs at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ica-osgeo-labs