[Geo4All] [OSGeo-Discuss] Is it possible for properitery GIS vendor to market thier properitery product as Open ?

Finn, Michael mfinn at usgs.gov
Mon Mar 27 09:22:32 PDT 2017


All,

This is a topic that we will have a presentation on at our Spatial data
infrastructures, standards, open source and open data for geospatial
(SDI-Open 2017) workshop at ICC 2017. As you likely learned from this
listServ or ohers, the ICA's Commission on Open Source Geospatial
Technologies (http://opensourcegeospatial.icaci.org/) is organizing this
pre-conference workshop with the ICA Commission on SDI and Standards.(
http://icc2017.org/preconference-workshops/).

We are holding the workshop on 01 & 02 July 2017 at George Washington
University in DC. We will be using one of their GIS labs.We held a similar
workshop, SDI-Open in 2015, in Rio de Janeiro. (
http://sdistandards.icaci.org/sdi-open-2015-proceedings/)

I have asked Mamata Akella, from CartoDB, Inc., USA, to speak on this
topic. It will be a 20 minute presentation but if you attend there will be
plenty of time to discuss this over the two day workshop period.

I have a draft agenda that is really not refined enough to share but I am
willing to share to anyone who would like me to send them a copy.

In addition in my role as Vice-Chair of the Open Source commission, I a
member of the ICC Scientific Program Committee and can let you know that
our commission has planned (but not finalized) 12 sessions (of 3 or 4
presentations) during the duration of the conference from papers submitted
and accepted.

I really hope you will consider attending this workshop and this fantastic
international conference.

Mike




Michael P. Finn
Research Cartographer
Center of Excellence for Geospatial Information Science
U. S. Geological Survey
Denver Federal Center
Box 25046, Mail Stop 510
Denver, CO 80225-0046


*NOTE*:
I will be retiring from the USGS/ US Federal Government Civil Service on 02
Jun 2017. On 03 Jun 2017, this email account, mfinn at usgs.gov, will be
obliterated. Therefore, please add *my new email address,
**finn.cartographer at gmail.com
<finn.cartographer at gmail.com> *to your address book to maintain
communication.

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:55 PM, Ravi Kumar <manarajahmundry2015 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> This is a good thread, and let us discuss to derive a 'Note', for those
> facing 'Questions', evangelising Free and Open GIS.
>
> I suggest this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_platform for many who
> wish to know.
> May be we can have a page on, 'OSGeo Wiki' on this topic.
> Cheers
> Ravi Kumar
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 1:45 AM, Suchith Anand <
> Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have a query. If a properitery GIS vendor starts marketing thier
>> properitery products as Open platform and software then what rights do the
>> organisations and customers have who are mislead buying the  properitery
>> software thinking it is open have ?  The definision of Proprietary
>> software [1] is very clearly defined, so  how can it be possible for any
>> properitery GIS vendor to market their  software knowingly as open platform
>> if it is properitery?
>>
>> This also greatly affects the business and revenues of true open source
>> software companies .  Who is responsible for any misleading marketing that
>> results in losses to both customers who are mislead to buy the
>> properitery software thinking it is open  and also to other companies
>> who do true open source business who lose out on the business
>> opportunities? Is it right business ethics to do this?
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Suchith
>>
>> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proprietary_software
>>
>>
>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
>> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
>> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.
>>
>> Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
>> message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
>> author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
>> University of Nottingham.
>>
>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
>> computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
>> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
>> permitted by UK legislation.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GeoForAll mailing list
> GeoForAll at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geoforall
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geoforall/attachments/20170327/6cf6b913/attachment.html>


More information about the GeoForAll mailing list