[Geo4All] website feedback survey

[Jody Garnett]

We should be sure to include this feedback in the feedback survey form, I
imagine we will use the resulting report to set development priorities for
the coming year.

We have a had a couple of great ideas on the GeoForAll list that we did not
end up getting into the issue tracker for discussion (or arrived too late
to be implemented.) This feedback form is a good opportunity to take part
in the planning for subsequent improvements.

I note that budget requests have gone out for 2018, given the large number
of ideas generated by this list the GeoForAll committee may wish to request
a budget (to set up a small contract) to explore and implement some of the
ideas and enhancements that missed out on this years website reboot.

--
Jody Garnett

On 24 October 2017 at 16:15, Helena Mitasova <hmitaso at ncsu.edu> wrote:

> Jody, geoforall community
>
> I think you answered this issue but I can see where the problem still
> remains with listing of partners.
>
> On the geoforall landing page when you scroll down we have a section
> Partners which has only ICA and ISPRS
> (this follows what was on the original website but it is not up to date)
> http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/initiatives/geo-for-all/
>
> To make this manageable, I think that the best would be just to link the
> text Partners to this page
> http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/partners/
>
> some of these partners were initiated through Geoforall (e.g., ICA, AGILE,
> UCGIS), others through other OSGeo committees (e.g., OGC, LH corp, US DoI)
> but they are all OSGeo MoUs and as such Partners for Geoforall as well.
> Is this something that you could do easily or should we wait for the
> website to be moved to osgeo?
>
> Note to all - perhaps to do after the webstite is moved to osgeo.
>
> - We need text for Use open source GIS in classroom, is your research for
> classproject webpages.
>
> - Also, the map needs to be replaced after the tech issues are resolved.
> There have been two other versions
> of the map but as I understand it there were issues, so I hope that this
> one is a placeholder - it makes the page
> difficult (a real pain for me on desktop)  to scroll down. I would almost
> suggest to skip it and include a link to the old map and/or here
> http://kartoweb.itc.nl/D3tests/GeoForAllMap/
>
> I already filled in the survey couple days ago,
>
> Helena
>
> On Oct 24, 2017, at 6:26 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks to everyone who participated in the foss4g sprint! The sprint was
> successful in creating content for the beta website.
>
> Our vendor, Get Interactive, has completed fixing issues reported. Their
> final task is producing a report based on community review and feedback.
>
> Please help:
>
> 1) Try out the beta website http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl
>
> 2) Fill out the provided survey, it will take about 5 minutes:
> http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/site-survey/
>
> Thanks,
> Marketing Committee
> _______________________________________________
> GeoForAll mailing list
> GeoForAll at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geoforall
>
>
> Helena Mitasova
> Professor at the Department of Marine,
> Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences
> and Center for Geospatial Analytics
> North Carolina State University
> Raleigh, NC 27695-8208
> hmitaso at ncsu.edu
> http://geospatial.ncsu.edu/osgeorel/publications.html
>
> "All electronic mail messages in connection with State business which are
> sent to or received by this account are subject to the NC Public Records
> Law and may be disclosed to third parties.”
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geoforall/attachments/20171024/0fe8738d/attachment.html>