[Geo4All] Do GeoEthics motivate to intellectual work?

[Munich Orientation Convention]

Hi Christopher,

 

I'm a German-Brazilian inventor and I've developed an orientation system
based on imaginary clocks.

Would the Locus Charter be open for discussions about the following
innovative topics?

 

Reference Grid

=============

 

What is better:                              maps with or without reference
grids www.volksnav.de/aSimpleCircle ?

Acc. to USNGFlorida.org, a map without a grid is a picture, a gridded map is
a tool.

 

 

NonAcademic Location Codes

=========================

 

Does the society - academic, nonacademic, the blind etc. - need nonacademic
location codes?

 

- If not (OSM, OGC etc.), why are there so many ideas
www.volksnav.de/alternatives ?

- If yes, must they be enigmatic or can be imaginable, for example for
shanty towns www.volksnav.de/Favela ?

 

 

Merit principle

==============

 

Standardization boards work according to the principle "not the best but
free" www.volksnav.de/DIN (English on bottom). 

Is this compatible with EthicalGEO? Only free ideas are good ideas? Only
applause as merit for intellectual work? Is this enough motivation?

 

 

Symbolical fees

============

 

The good but forgotten tool Symbolical Fees can help to solve the never
ending free/proprietary conflict, tendency to piracy etc. 

Would the Locus Charter support this?

 

Henrique

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geoforall/attachments/20220810/c580e172/attachment.htm>