[geojquery] Github or Gitorious

[arsgeografica]

Mornin',

My 2c: Gitorious seems the place to be with it's project-centered approach.
GeoJQuery should be the name, it wouldn't interfere with any file naming
scheme anyways in my opinion. The file naming scheme should then of course
be the one preferred by JQuery itself - it just makes life easier for anyone
who knows JQuery (plugins) and wants to use / understand / get involved
GeoJQuery.

Cheers,
  Crischan

On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Marc Jansen <jansen at terrestris.de> wrote:

>
> Hi Yves.
>
> Keep those cents coming!
> m
> I'm in for Gitorious for the same reasons, but wouldn't mind too uch if we
> decide the other way. Let's get this started!
>
> Bye,
> Marc
>
>
> Am 16.07.2010 14:32, schrieb Yves Moisan:
>
>
>>
>>>  I really like what I see at Gitorious, though I haven't used it heavily
>>> yet. I prefer going for Gitorious. Please leave your comments.
>>>
>>
>> A comment from soneone who doesn't know either of Git (except to have
>> heard of it), Github or Gitorious but who reads the FSF bulletin when he can
>> : Gitorious is "fully" free software.
>>
>> My 2 non-programmer/outsider 2 cents
>>
>> Yves
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geojquery mailing list
>> Geojquery at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geojquery
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Geojquery mailing list
> Geojquery at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geojquery
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geojquery/attachments/20100719/b031ea7f/attachment.html