[geomoose-psc] catching up

[Jody Garnett]

Frank also reminded me of http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Board_Meeting_2012-10-11 and asked if GeoMoose would make it onto the agenda? 

-- 
Jody Garnett


On Tuesday, 9 October 2012 at 11:21 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:

> > I also had the following from the incubation meeting (http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/IncCom_Meeting20):
> > - Frank really wanted to see a code contribution agreement, or a clear notice that one was not being used
> > 
> > "FrankW: Normally for projects without a legal contribution agreement it is good to make clear guidelines on provenance responsibilities and to have each committer agree to it. It would certainly be desirable to make that more explicit."
> > 
> Frank offered the following clarification on the incubation email list:
> > I think I raised the concern, and I was looking for something like the "Legal" section of the GDAL commiter guidelines stressing the responsibilities of commiters to ensure the code they commit is appropriately contributed:
> > 
> >   http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc3_commiters
> > 
> > On GDAL (and some similar projects) we expect new commiters to publically acknowledge that they have read the guidelines and will endevour to adhere to them on the project mailing list so there is a lightweight record. 
> > 
> > The goal is to ensure that commiters understand their responsibilities, and to demonstrate that the project had made reasonable efforts to keep the code base clean.  
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Frank
> > 
> 
>  
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20121009/d5d95633/attachment.html>