[geomoose-psc] Moving "Support" link to a more prominent spot on the GeoMoose Home page.
Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)
bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us
Thu Sep 20 14:32:04 PDT 2012
Ok, I'm here now . . .
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Eli Adam [mailto:eadam at co.lincoln.or.us]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 3:33 PM
>> To: Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)
>> Cc: Brian Fischer; Dan Little; Brent Fraser; Jim Klassen
>> Subject: Re: Moving "Support" link to a more prominent spot on
>> the GeoMoose Home page.
>>
>> Please consider subscribing to and using,
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)
>> <bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us> wrote:
>> > All,
>> >
>> > I was supposed to start this thread earlier than this after the
>> PSC meeting, sorry.
>> >
>> > So, a couple of points to discuss/vote on:
>> >
>> > ** Adding a "Support" link to a more prominent location on the
>> home
>> > page. I propose adding into the top link bar, possibly after
>> the
>> > "Developers"?? link. This would link to the existing page:
>> > http://www.geomoose.org/info/commercial_support.html
>>
>> I support more prominent 'support'. I have a knee jerk reaction
>> against adding to the top link bar but will raise no objection in
>> this case.
>>
>> +1 Eli
>>
>> >
>> > ** Second, I would like to optionally add in the logos for each
>> of the companies listed.
>>
>> +1 Eli (some reasonable 1"-1.5" tall logo preferably coordinated
>> and
>> placed by one person so that it looks nice and not disjointed).
>>
>> >
>> > There didn't seem to be any dissension froim the group at the
>> meeting about these items.
>> >
>> > We did discuss a little bit about trying to figure out some
>> sort of certification process to apply to the list, but I don't
>> believe we have a viable method for applying something like this
>> right now.
>>
>> If it arises that people/companies with no GeoMoose relation are
>> wanting to fill this area, we can add some rule like: must
>> correctly resolve 10 issues on the email list every year to get
>> listed. Tickets with patches that are applied can count at 1
>> issue per 10 lines of code. I don't anticipate problems. If
>> they arise, we'll deal with it. In my mind, support on the GM
>> site is for companies that are making a noticeable positive
>> contribution to GM.
>>
>> I don't think that there are any restrictions on registering
>> here, http://www.osgeo.org/search_profile, and those not making a
>> noticeable positive contribution to GM are free to do so.
>>
>> Eli
>>
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>> >
>> > Bobb
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>> -----Original Message-----
>> >>> From: Eli Adam [mailto:eadam at co.lincoln.or.us]
>> >>> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 8:21 PM
>> >>> To: Brian Fischer
>> >>> Cc: Dan Little; Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul); Brent Fraser; Jim
>> >>> Klassen
>> >>> Subject: Re: GeoMOOSE PSC Roadmap Meeting - Friday,
>> Sept.14th 10-
>> >>> 2 - Date, time, place?, connectivity?
>> >>>
>> >>> Ok, coming up on this soon.
>> >>>
>> >>> This looks to be the to-do list:
>> >>> 1. Determine connectivity/communication method for Brent and
>> I 2.
>> >>> Announce meeting on list (people can ask for directions if
>> >>> attending in person or connectivity if remote) 3. Review and
>> update
>> >>>
>> http://geomoose.org/wiki/index.php/09_14_2012_Roadmap_Planning_Me
>> >>> eting
>> >>> 4. Anything else?
>> >>>
>> >>> Please spend time thinking about everything on the agenda to
>> >>> maximize productivity while we are together
>> >>>
>> >>> (Bob, should incubation be on the agenda?)
>> >>>
>> >>> Please add in anything I left out.
>> >>>
>> >>> Eli
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Brian Fischer
>> >>> <bfischer at houstoneng.com> wrote:
>> >>> > I'm assuming you are referring to FOSS4G-NA next May? If
>> so I
>> >>> would > say that fits under the "promotion" item and would
>> be lower
>> >>> priority > discussion than other things at this meeting.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > The format for the FOSS4G-NA conference has not been set
>> in
>> >>> stone yet, > for example we still don't know if we are going
>> to
>> >>> have workshops at FOSS4G-NA
>> >>> > yet. All we know is the date and place for now. I'm on
>> the
>> >>> planning
>> >>> > committee so I can keep the group informed on
>> opportunities to
>> >>> promote > GeoMoose.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Brian Fischer, CFM
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Principal | GIS Project Manager
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Houston Engineering, Inc.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > O 763.493.4522 | D 763.493.6664 | M 763.229.2734 > > >
>> >
>> >>> From: Dan Little [mailto:danlittle at yahoo.com] > Sent:
>> Thursday,
>> >>> August 23, 2012 9:03 AM > To: Brian Fischer; Basques, Bob
>> >>> (CI-StPaul); eadam at co.lincoln.or.us; > Brent Fraser > >
>> > Cc:
>> >>> Jim Klassen > Subject: Re: GeoMOOSE PSC Roadmap Meeting -
>> Friday,
>> >>> Sept.14th
>> >>> 10-2 -
>> >>> > Date, time, place?, connectivity?
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Would FOSS4G plans be for this meeting or is that a better
>> >>> discussion > item for other times (August / October)?
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > ________________________________
>> >>> >
>> >>> > From: Brian Fischer <bfischer at houstoneng.com> > To: Dan
>> Little
>> >>> <danlittle at yahoo.com>; "Basques, Bob (CI- StPaul)"
>> >>> > <bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us>; "eadam at co.lincoln.or.us"
>> >>> > <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us>; Brent Fraser
>> <bfraser at geoanalytic.com>
>> >>> > Cc: Jim Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com> > Sent: Thursday,
>> August
>> >>> 23, 2012 8:38 AM > Subject: RE: GeoMOOSE PSC Roadmap Meeting
>> -
>> >>> Friday, Sept.14th
>> >>> 10-2 -
>> >>> > Date, time, place?, connectivity?
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Ok, started a wiki page.
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> http://www.geomoose.org/wiki/index.php/09_14_2012_Roadmap_Plannin
>> >>> g_Mee
>> >>> > ting Please add to it. I tried to list items in order of
>> >>> importance > for discussion purposes.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Brian Fischer, CFM
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Principal | GIS Project Manager
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Houston Engineering, Inc.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > O 763.493.4522 | D 763.493.6664 | M 763.229.2734 > > >
>> >
>> >>> From: Dan Little [mailto:danlittle at yahoo.com] > Sent:
>> Wednesday,
>> >>> August 22, 2012 1:07 PM > To: Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul);
>> Brian
>> >>> Fischer; eadam at co.lincoln.or.us; > Brent Fraser > Cc: Jim
>> Klassen
>> >>> > Subject: Re: GeoMOOSE PSC Roadmap Meeting - Friday,
>> Sept.14th
>> >>> 10-2 -
>> >>> > Date, time, place?, connectivity?
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Another discussion item:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Modernizing the Demo.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > a. Integrated Search
>> >>> >
>> >>> > b. More useful demonstration of default services.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > c. Integrating table-based results from things like
>> Select.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > ________________________________
>> >>> >
>> >>> > From: "Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)"
>> <bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us> >
>> >>> To: Dan Little <danlittle at yahoo.com>; Brian Fischer >
>> >>> <bfischer at houstoneng.com>; "eadam at co.lincoln.or.us"
>> >>> > <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us>; Brent Fraser
>> <bfraser at geoanalytic.com>
>> >>> > Cc: Jim Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com> > Sent: Wednesday,
>> August
>> >>> 22, 2012 12:39 PM > Subject: RE: GeoMOOSE PSC Roadmap
>> Meeting -
>> >>> Friday, Sept.14th
>> >>> 10-2 -
>> >>> > Date, time, place?, connectivity?
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > All,
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Not really a Coding roadmap item, but I would like to
>> enhance
>> >>> the > visibility of "support" resources for GeoMoose, and
>> I'm
>> >>> willing to > take on this aspect roadmap wise and include
>> this as
>> >>> a discussion item.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Bobb
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > From: Dan Little [mailto:danlittle at yahoo.com] > Sent:
>> Wednesday,
>> >>> August 22, 2012 12:29 PM > To: Brian Fischer;
>> >>> eadam at co.lincoln.or.us; Brent Fraser > Cc: Jim Klassen;
>> Basques,
>> >>> Bob (CI-StPaul) > Subject: Re: GeoMOOSE PSC Roadmap Meeting
>> -
>> >>> Friday, Sept.14th
>> >>> 10-2 -
>> >>> > Date, time, place?, connectivity?
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > PSC Meeting Rules:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Rule I: No coding.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Otherwise, yes, we should start an outline of discussion
>> items.
>> >>> Some
>> >>> > thoughts of mine:
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > 1. Establish a policy on underlaying library upgrades. We
>> >>> should have > an understanding and publish that to the user
>> base.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > 2. Library Upgrades:
>> >>> >
>> >>> > a. OpenLayers (latest Stable)
>> >>> >
>> >>> > b. Dojo (1.8 / latest Stable)
>> >>> >
>> >>> > 3. Extensions, documentation of extensions, and philosophy
>> on
>> >>> deploy > strategies. I know what JimK is doing but it may
>> not be
>> >>> appropriate > for our userbase at-large.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > ________________________________
>> >>> >
>> >>> > From: Brian Fischer <bfischer at houstoneng.com> > To:
>> >>> "eadam at co.lincoln.or.us" <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us>; Brent
>> Fraser >
>> >>> <bfraser at geoanalytic.com> > Cc: Dan Little
>> <danlittle at yahoo.com>;
>> >>> Jim Klassen > <klassen.js at gmail.com>; Bob Basques
>> >>> <Bob.Basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us> > Sent: Wednesday, August 22,
>> 2012
>> >>> 12:15 PM > Subject: RE: GeoMOOSE PSC Roadmap Meeting -
>> Friday,
>> >>> Sept.14th
>> >>> 10-2 -
>> >>> > Date, time, place?, connectivity?
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Would it make sense to start a wiki page for the roadmap
>> meeting
>> >>> > agenda? If so I can start a page. I have a feeling we are
>> going
>> >>> to > have more content to discuss than 4 hours will allow us
>> to,
>> >>> but at > least we will have all the ideas down and can
>> prioritize
>> >>> them for discussion purposes.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > If we have a wiki page, at least I can put my thoughts
>> somewhere
>> >>> > before I lose them. Which seems to happen often ;-) > >
>> Brian
>> >>> Fischer, CFM > Principal | GIS Project Manager > Houston
>> >>> Engineering, Inc.
>> >>> > O 763.493.4522 | D 763.493.6664 | M 763.229.2734 > > >
>> >>> -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Fischer > Sent:
>> Monday,
>> >>> August 20, 2012 3:39 PM > To: 'eadam at co.lincoln.or.us';
>> Brent
>> >>> Fraser > Cc: Dan Little; Jim Klassen; Bob Basques >
>> Subject: RE:
>> >>> GeoMOOSE PSC Roadmap Meeting - Friday, Sept.14th
>> >>> 10-2 -
>> >>> > Date, time, place?, connectivity?
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Dan, Bob and Jim - I can host at our office if you all
>> want to
>> >>> drive > to Maple Grove. I could setup a conference call
>> line and
>> >>> TeamViewer > web meeting for video. Might even be able to
>> convince
>> >>> Houston to by > us lunch > :-) > > Is anyone opposed if
>> I
>> >>> invite Andrew Sheppard to the meeting as well, > even
>> though he
>> >>> isn't on the PSC? He could speak much better about the >
>> >>> technical design issues he faced rather than you all hearing
>> it
>> >>> second had from me.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Thanks for organizing this Eli!
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Brian Fischer, CFM
>> >>> > Principal | GIS Project Manager
>> >>> > Houston Engineering, Inc.
>> >>> > O 763.493.4522 | D 763.493.6664 | M 763.229.2734 > > >
>> >>> -----Original Message----- > From: Eli Adam
>> >>> [mailto:eadam at co.lincoln.or.us] > Sent: Monday, August 20,
>> 2012
>> >>> 3:10 PM > To: Brent Fraser > Cc: Dan Little; Jim Klassen;
>> Brian
>> >>> Fischer; Bob Basques > Subject: GeoMOOSE PSC Roadmap Meeting
>> -
>> >>> Friday, Sept.14th 10-2
>> >>> - Date,
>> >>> > time, place?, connectivity?
>> >>> >
>> >>> > All,
>> >>> >
>> >>> > We now have our date and time (I think we have the time)!
>> >>> Friday,
>> >>> > September 14, 2012 12-4 (MN Time) I have gotten confused
>> on the
>> >>> time > zones. If it was not 12-4 Central, let me know the
>> time
>> >>> that it was supposed to be.
>> >>> > Otherwise, meeting starts at,
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=20
>> >>> 12&mo
>> >>> > nth=9&day=14&hour=17&min=0&sec=0&p1=219&p2=202&p3=55
>> >>> > and lasts 4 hours.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > I'll let the locals determine the place as well as some
>> audio
>> >>> and > perhaps visual connectivity options for Brent and I
>> (more
>> >>> below). As > a virtual attendee, I have some preference for
>> a
>> >>> location with > reliable and plentiful connectivity (i.e.
>> somewhat
>> >>> opposed to coffee > shop on the corner with intermittent
>> and/or
>> >>> slow connection).
>> >>> If I
>> >>> > were there, I would suggest starting with an early lunch
>> >>> somewhere > nearby at 11 (or ordering pizza to arrive at
>> 11:30).
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Brent Fraser >
>> >>> <bfraser at geoanalytic.com> > wrote:
>> >>> >> I can only attend virtually, so I'm flexible. An
>> thoughts on
>> >>> the >> virtual tech (Skype?, Google video chat?, other?) >
>> > I'm
>> >>> also attending virtually. Dan and Brian offered WebEx or
>> similar
>> >>> > type things which includes sound, visual, and text. The
>> main >
>> >>> interaction at the meeting will be audio and some visual
>> since most
>> >>> > people will be there in person. I don't think that I have
>> a >
>> >>> preference for anything specific except that it should
>> include at
>> >>> > least audio and hopefully be easy to hear and speak. I
>> think
>> >>> that > I'll defer to whoever is supporting it on the other
>> end as
>> >>> to > specifics. Brent, if you have a specific preference,
>> let
>> >>> whoever is supporting it know.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Once the meeting location and connectivity is determined,
>> we can
>> >>> > announce on the list and people can request connectivity
>> details
>> >>> or > directions if they are inclined.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > At the August 30th PSC meeting, we can work on an agenda
>> for the
>> >>> > RoadMap Meeting as well as approaches to those RoadMap
>> agenda
>> >>> items in > addition to our other PSC meeting work. Below is
>> what I
>> >>> had put > together previously for the RoadMap but it need
>> more and
>> >>> specifics.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > At the PSC monthly meeting, we raised a few things which
>> need
>> >>> further > discussion and decision. Things like: build system
>> type
>> >>> and necessity, > how extensions are done, upgrade to Dojo
>> 1.7 and
>> >>> AMD-style class > definitions, versioning, test suite,
>> additional
>> >>> configuration > parameters, selection interaction, etc. Also
>> >>> perhaps review some of > the decisions and good progress
>> we've
>> >>> made since the F2F at FOSS4G 2011.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > This will be a ~4 hour meeting.
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Later, Eli
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >
>> >
More information about the geomoose-psc
mailing list