[geomoose-psc] RFC-7

[Dan Little]

Windows compatibility was a notable fault if the previous build chain. It's
notably as a maxim/goal and definitely not a subcomponent.

On Jul 10, 2017 4:58 PM, "Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)" <
bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us> wrote:

> Vote:  +1
>
> Just one comment (not a make break by any means) . . .
>
> GOALS (#7), does MS4W need to be specified?  There's nothing in there
> about any other OS for example.
>
> Actually after pondering a bit more, wouldn’t MS4W be another (optional)
> toolchain component?
>
> bobb
>
>
> On Jul 10, 2017, at 4:10 PM, Dan Little <theduckylittle at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey Folks!
>
> This is the official authorization for GM3.0... please comment and vote!
>
> - https://geomoose.org/rfc/rfc-7.html
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Duck
> _______________________________________________
> geomoose-psc mailing list
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>
>
>
>
> "Interesting - I use a Mac to help me design the next Cray." - Seymoure
> Cray (1925-1996) when he was told that Apple Inc. had recently bought a
> Cray supercomputer to help them design the next Mac.
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20170710/f4f1dba6/attachment-0001.html>