[geomoose-psc] 3.0 beta testing

[Jeff McKenna]

Ticket filed for that warning: https://github.com/geomoose/gm3/issues/186

-jeff



On 2017-07-11 5:18 PM, Jeff McKenna wrote:
> Works well with the data!  I'm going to add this to the installer today 
> or tomorrow morning.
> 
> I do see a msProjectRect() warning (in the Apache error log) when I 
> tried the Identify tool (I don't think this happened with 2.9.3) :
> 
> [Tue Jul 11 17:15:17.850862 2017] [cgi:error] [pid 5336:tid 1124] 
> [client 127.0.0.1:52058] AH01215: msProjectRect(): Warning: degenerate 
> rect 
> {-10371918.100936,5552707.780121,-10371918.100936,5552707.780121}\r: 
> C:/ms4w/Apache/cgi-bin/mapserv.exe, referer: 
> http://127.0.0.1/gm3/desktop/index.html
> 
> The identify result looked correct in the interface.
> 
> -jeff
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 2017-07-11 4:54 PM, Dan Little wrote:
>> Hey Jeff,
>>
>> Can you checkout the quickstart? The site.css is intentionally not 
>> included as it's an "empty" target for people to drop in their own CSS.
>>
>> Link to the quickstart:
>> - https://theduckylittle.github.io/gm3/ms4w-quickstart/index.html
>>
>> I suspect the blank map is because you're missing the *data* package.
>>
>> To be honest, the code is pretty solid. When was your date for the 
>> MS4W release? I can probably have the short list of known bugs fixed 
>> by whenever that is.
>>
>> -Duck
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Jeff McKenna 
>> <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com <mailto:jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com>> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi all,
>>
>>     I'm trying to get the 3.0 beta working with MS4W; I get a 404 error
>>     for a missing "site.css" file, that is not included in either of the
>>     3.0 beta packages posted on https://www.geomoose.org/download.html
>>     <https://www.geomoose.org/download.html>.
>>
>>     (I also get a blank map, but, I thought I'd start with the missing
>>     site.css file)
>>
>>     Related question: a new MS4W is going out the door shortly, should
>>     the installer also point to this GM3 beta?  (I was thinking to allow
>>     users to install 2.9.3 or 3.0-beta).  Or, should I wait a bit until
>>     these little issues are ironed out.  Let me know
>>
>>     thanks,
>>
>>     -jeff
>>