[geomoose-psc] RFC-7

[Eli Adam]

I've been offline and will vote +0 for now in the absence of catching
up and testing.

Is the release in accordance with
https://www.geomoose.org/rfc/rfc-3.html and
https://www.geomoose.org/developer/release.html#how-to-release (does
this need updating and/or a new 3.# version)?

Supporting Windows in the development tool chain is very admirable but
I'm not entirely sure needed.  Supporting Windows fully for deployment
is really important.  Many things, arguably not part of the
development tool chain, (nightly builds, post commit hooks, release
preparation, etc) are done in bash and other things.

Oh, I see that I'm confused.  This isn't for a release, this is to
undertake the 3.0 direction.  Yeah, +1.

Eli


On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 5:12 PM, TC Haddad <tchaddad at gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Dan Little <theduckylittle at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Bump! Eli, TC, can we get a vote?
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 9:00 AM, James Klassen <klassen.js at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Jul 10, 2017 4:10 PM, "Dan Little" <theduckylittle at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hey Folks!
>>>>
>>>> This is the official authorization for GM3.0... please comment and vote!
>>>>
>>>> - https://geomoose.org/rfc/rfc-7.html
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> -Duck
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>>>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geomoose-psc mailing list
> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc