[geomoose-psc] quick website question, where to put geomoose as a technology?
Jody Garnett
jody.garnett at gmail.com
Tue Oct 17 21:29:53 PDT 2017
Agreed Tanya, this is part of what I am working on tonight, double checking
where projects want to be listed.
On the plus side the SAC committee had a meeting and is taking steps to
host the website and let us all edit using our LDAP credentials :)
--
Jody Garnett
On 17 October 2017 at 16:25, TC Haddad <tchaddad at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I notice that there is nothing listed under Client:
>
> Home <http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/> » Choose a project
> <http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/choose-a-project/> » Information
> Technology
> <http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/choose-a-project/information-technology/>
> » Client
> <http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/choose-a-project/information-technology/client/>
> Would it make sense to go there?
>
> Personally, for the purposes of the OSGeo website (targeted at new users
> wanting to convert to FOSS) would call GeoMoose a "Configurable Map
> Viewer", which to me means it is essentially an easy to set up client. The
> advanced features mentioned by Jim and Bob are also great, but are a bonus
> for most users seeking to fulfill the first use case.
>
> Projects that fit under "Portal" in my mind would be things like
> GeoNetwork and GeoNode, but maybe I am being to limited in my thinking?
>
> Tanya
>
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul) <
> bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us> wrote:
>
>> Jody,
>>
>> It’s actually usable in both of the those categories. I would lean a bit
>> more towards the Portal description though. GeoMoose was put together in
>> the forst place to handle the dissemination of large GeoSpatail datasets
>> covering a large area, while still allowing the users to get at the data
>> they needed for their little corner of the map world.
>>
>> At it’s heart, it was intended to oraganize and distribute many data
>> layers while also aloow for a visual interface for the discovery of the
>> spatially referenced data (A Portal). The GeoMoose demo is packaged as a
>> Portal too. But a key point is that while GeoMoose can connect to other
>> Web services. It’s essentially a Javascript application that can be used
>> to mine OGC services. The Demo has these services originating from
>> MapServer. GeoMoose can also use Tiles, raster and vector, as well as be
>> configured to run in standalone mode. It really only requires a Browser
>> and some datasets to operate. A web server helps, but I think I could set
>> it up to run from a flat file location too (I can be corrected here, and
>> proably will :c).
>>
>> It’s really (REALLY) hard to describe all the GeoMoose capabilities
>> actually. I’m of the mind to figure out how to pachage it up in more than
>> on way actually, but it’s just not been gotten to yet. Others here will
>> likely say I’m not 100% with any of this too.
>>
>> bobb
>>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 17, 2017, at 5:48 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I was trying out the website, filling in a website survey that was sent
>> to participants last week (and the discussion list this week).
>>
>> One thing that startled me was where geomoose lives in the
>> choose-a-project wizard.
>>
>> choose a project <http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/choose-a-project/> > information
>> technology
>> <http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/choose-a-project/information-technology/> >
>> web services
>> <http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/choose-a-project/information-technology/web-services/> -
>> yes!
>> choose a project <http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/choose-a-project/> > information
>> technology
>> <http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/choose-a-project/information-technology/> >
>> portal
>> <http://osgeo.getinteractive.nl/choose-a-project/information-technology/portal/>
>> - no?
>>
>> Did I do a bad job of describing "portal"? It used to be called
>> "intengrated" but then everyone chose it, now that it is called portal
>> nobody has chosen it.
>>
>> Goal is to describe an application (like GeoMOOSE?) that can be used for
>> web mapping out of the box using only configuration ... or do I have the
>> wrong idea about GeoMOOSE?
>> --
>> Jody Garnett
>> _______________________________________________
>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Don’t ever wrestle with a pig. You’ll both get dirty, but the pig will
>> enjoy it.
>> —Cale Yarborough
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geomoose-psc mailing list
>> geomoose-psc at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/geomoose-psc
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/geomoose-psc/attachments/20171017/b882dcb7/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the geomoose-psc
mailing list